Imane, who has recently completed her PhD, will be giving the following talk as part of the Coventry University School of Humanities Research Talks Series on Weds 11 March 16:00-17:00 in the George Eliot building GE403:

Rethinking Marginal Otherness: An Integrated Approach to Disability as a Social Construct in Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury (1929)

Imane Bouchakour

bouchaki@uni.coventry.ac.uk

This study examines the construction of Benjy’s disability identity in William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury (1929). It proposes a new platform for the investigation of the linguistic, stylistic and social constructions of disability identity, to rethink the status of marginal Otherness in the novel. It suggests that Faulkner criticizes the dynamics of normativity and constructs an empowering disability identity for Benjy. As such, it forms part of the emerging critical reconceptualization of disability informed by disability studies. The study develops a new approach that integrates literary disability studies, the Social Model of disability and corpus stylistics to shift critical understandings of disability. Corpus stylistic findings constitute the basis for literary interpretations, allowing theories drawn from disability studies and social constructionism to be synthesized in support of corpus stylistic analyses. The cooperation between corpus stylistics and literary theory provides new insights into the novel’s construction of disability.

The study challenges earlier responses to Benjy’s disability drawn from the former Medical Model, and criticizes their claims about his idiocy and mindlessness. Following the lead of disability scholars (Garland-Thomson 1997; 2001; Mitchell and Snyder 2000; Quayson 2006; Davis 2013; Bérubé 2016; Hall 2016) who have disassociated disability from impairment and suggested a move towards a more positive identification of disability, the study destabilizes the normative notions and stereotypes emphasized in prior studies to highlight Benjy’s extraordinary disability identity. This approach would make a significant contribution to literary disability studies of Faulkner’s Benjy by subverting the dominant conceptions of disability as a site of defect.

Keywords: disability identity, deviance, Otherness, empowering identity, extraordinary mind

social constructionism, literary disability studies

References

Bérubé, M. (2016) The Secret Life of Stories from Don Quixote to Harry Potter, How Understanding Intellectual Disability Transforms the Way We Read. New York: NUP

Davis, L. J. (2103) ‘Constructing Normalcy: The Bell Curve, the Novel, and the Invention of the Disabled Body in the Nineteenth Century’. in The Disability Studies Reader. ed. by Davis, L. J. London and New York: Tailor and Francis Group

Garland-Thomson, R. (1997) Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. Columbia: Columbia University Press

Hall, A. (2016) Disability and Modern Fiction: Faulkner, Morrison and Coetzee and the Noble Prize for Literature. London: Palgrave Macmillan

Kristeva, J. (1984) Revolution in Poetic Language. New York: Colombia UP

Mahlberg, M. (2009) ‘Corpus Stylistics and the Pickwickian Watering-Pot’. in Contemporary Corpus Linguistics. ed. by Baker, P.  London: Continuum International Publishing

Mahlberg, M. (2010) ‘Corpus Linguistics and the Study of Nineteenth- Century Fiction’ Journal of Victorian Culture [online] 15 (2), 292-298.  available from < https://bham.academia.edu/MichaelaMahlberg> [ 18 September 2016]

Mahlberg, M. and McIntyre, D. (2011) ‘A case for corpus stylistics: Ian Fleming’s Casino Royale’ English Text Construction 4 (2), 204-227

McIntyre, D. (2015) ‘Towards an Integrated Corpus Stylistics’. Topics in Linguistics (16) [online]. available from < <http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/29616/1/%5BTopics%20in%20Linguistics%5D%20Towards%20an%20integrated%20corpus%20stylistics.pdf> [15 June 2018]

Mitchell, D. T. and Snyder, S. L. (2000) Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. Michigan: Michigan University Press

Oliver, M. (1996) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. London: Macmillan Press Ltd

Quayson, A. (2006) Aesthetic Nervousness: Disability and the Crisis of Representation. New York: Columbia University Press

Shakespeare, T. (1997) ‘Cultural representation of disabled people: Dustbins for    disavowal?’ Disability & Society [online] 9(3), 283-299. available from < https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237428703_Cultural_Representation_of_Disabled_People_Dustbins_for_Disavowal > [20 September 2016]

Showalter, E. (1997) ‘Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness’. on Autonomy and Assimilation in Afro-American and Feminist Literary Theory. ed. by Ward, R. and Herndl, D. P. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press

Siebers, T. (2010) Disability Aesthetics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Spivak, G. C. (1988) ‘Can the Subaltern Speak’. in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. ed.by Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L. Illinois: University of Illinois Press